Thering McCarley

Disability Discrimination

E-mail Print PDF
Disability Discrimination

Federal and Texas Law

The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is the Federal Law that makes it illegal  for employers to discriminate on the basis of a disability.

It makes it illegal for an employer to discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability in job  application procedures; the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees; employee  compensation; job training; or other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment, because of  the individual's disability.  Texas also protects disabled workers with the Texas Fair Employment  and Housing Act (TFEHA).

Qualified Individual with a Disability

For the employee to be eligible to make a claim of disability discrimination under the ADA or  TFEHA, they must be a "qualified individual with a disability." Meaning they must be able to do the  job. For instance, a person with no hands would not be qualified to be a typist. (However, see  below discussion on "reasonable accommodation").   If the employer did not give him the job, it  wouldn't be discrimination. It's just that the person simply isn't qualified.

"With a disability" means that the worker is actually disabled.  For an injury, disease, or their  ailment to be a "disability" under the law, it must "substantially limit one or more major life  activities." A mere annoyance is not enough. The disability must actually interfere with a person's  life.

In determining whether or not a person actually has a disability, the Courts pay close attention to  whether or not the ailment affects the person's job and ability to earn a living.  Even if the disability  does not affect most areas of life, if it affects the person's employment, it is more likely to be  considered a disability.

Perceived Disability

It is also unlawful to discriminate against a person who is perceived to have a disability.  If the  employee is not disabled but the employer believes the employee is disabled and discriminates  against the employee that is illegal.

In this circumstance, it is not necessary to determine if the employee is a "qualified individual" with  a disability.  The Court, however, may consider whether or not the person would have been a  qualified individual if he actually had the disability that the employer perceived him to have.  The  law is not entirely clear on this issue.

Reasonable Accommodation for an Employee with a Disability

Reasonable Accommodation is the idea that even if a person is disabled and even if that disability  may make it seem like they cannot do a job, the employer must consider whether or not a  "reasonable accommodation" can be made.   A "reasonable accommodation" is when the employer  modifies the job duties, provides some extra help, or takes some other measure to ensure that the  person can still be able to do the job.

For example: If a person in a wheelchair wants a job in an office that is on the second floor and  there are no elevators in the building, then the employer could install an elevator as an  accommodation.  However, it is probably not reasonable to expect the employer to spend money to  install an elevator.

Another possibility might be that the potential employee's job is really just talking on the telephone,  selling products.  Maybe the job can be done from home and there is no need to even be in the  office.  It could be reasonable to ask an employer to let the person work at home.

To qualify for a reasonable accommodation employees have to ask for the employer for an  accommodation.  Once they do, the employer has the right to consider the requests and make  counter-offers that the employer might see as more reasonable.   If the employer and employee  cannot agree, then the employee might want to consider bringing suit.  To win a suit the judge or  jury will have to find that the employee's request was reasonable, or that the employer's counter-  offers were not sufficient.
 

Translate

NEWS HIGHLIGHTS

  • 1
  • 2
Are you following us on Twitter? We now have over 2000 followers!
Thering McCarley PLLC has reached over 500 cases since the firm opened in October 2008
Thering McCarley has recovered over $100,000 for our clients in August 2011
Daniel Thering and Matthew McCarley recovered $150,000 for our client in an employment retaliation and discrimination case.
Daniel Thering and Matthew McCarley are off to a good start for the new year by recovering $530,000 on a contract dispute.
Congratulations to Daniel Thering for being named as one of Texas Super Lawyers Texas Rising Stars 2012. 
Thering McCarley PLLC would like to proudly annouce our partnership with the Frisco Roughriders!

YOU ARE HERE: